deCODE Genetics and Icelandic society

Dr. Steindór J. Erlingsson

This page was used "as a model for" the 2005 New England Workshop on Science and Social Change

 

The deCODE story has two very contrasting sides to it.  Speaking as a scholar interested in the history and sociology of science, the integration of deCODE into Icelandic society, which I detailed at a conference in Paris in 2001 and in a paper that was published in US Journal GeneWatch in 2002, reveals very well the political aspects of science.  Speaking, however, as an Icelander interested in democracy and human rights, deCODE's infiltration into Icelandic society has been a nightmare.  All the rules that apply in a democratic society were bent as far as possible to secure everything deCODE needed, which meant that the full weight of the Government was used even to secure the company financially, as a detailed Guardian story revealed in the fall 2002.

            The opposition against deCODE’s plans numbered very few but vocal individuals, who organised themselves in Mannvernd, Association of Icelanders for Ethics in Science and Medicine.  Mannvernd’s webpage contains numerous papers and newspaper articles published in English language outlets and English translations of Icelandic papers. Mannvernd has almost exclusively focused on the controversial Health Sector Database Act, of December 1998, which I know, from personal experience, was written by deCODE.  From the fall of 1998 until the spring of 2000 I worked as Director of the Information Resource Centre at the US Embassy in Iceland.  My responsibilities included daily meetings with the US ambassador, where I briefed him on the main stories in the Icelandic newspapers, and writing reports about various Icelandic issues.  One of my first duties was to write a report on the controversy that the Health Sector Database bill caused in Iceland in the fall of 1998.  At the end of November I had a meeting with the Kari Stefansson, the CEO of deCODE. When I came to his office dr. Stefansson was on the phone talking to someone and he directed me to take a seat. 

            I sat in his office for about 20 minutes before we started talking, and it gradually dawned on me that he was talking to a lawyer in the Icelandic Ministry of Health detailing the changes, article after article, that his lawyers had done on the bill.  I was in a shock after this experience, but it shows in a nutshell how closely the Icelandic Government and the company worked together. A year later I managed, literally, to get my revenged.  In October 1999 the Icelandic Government hosted an international women’s conference, whose key note speaker was Hilary Clinton, the First Lady of the United States.  Weeks before Mrs. Clinton’s arrival the US Embassy received a list form the White House detailing, in order of preference, the places Mrs. Clinton wanted to visit during her three days visit in Iceland.  When I saw the list I was shocked because at its top was deCODE Genetics.  I knew that a large number of foreign journalists would follow her in Iceland and if she would visit deCODE the company would get a very good publicity. Hence, I decided to give my supervisor at the Embassy an exaggerated account of the controversy that deCODE had created in Iceland, arguing that if Mrs. Clinton visited deCODE hell would brake loose.  As a result she never visited the company.

            As I indicated above Mannvernd has mainly focused on the HSD act, as a result they mostly ignored the no less controversial Act on Bio-banks, from the spring of 2000, which has enabled deCODE to collect blood samples from more than 1/3 of Iceland’s population of 290 thousand individual.  Being a biologist (BSc) and having written the paper  Introduction of Mendelism in Iceland, it was the spellbinding influence that this gigantic “gene collection” that has taken place in Iceland and its possible political implications that were the main themes of my critically acclaimed book Our Genes: Biotechnology and Icelandic Society (2002), that became the subject of an AP news story.  But, as one reviewer noted, “Erlingsson’s critique is not specifically directed towards deCODE Genetics … but towards the ideology behind molecular genetics in general … The outcome is a fresh and vigorous science criticism … [which is] very relevant to Icelanders.”  It is the reviewer’s “hope that the book will reach a wide audience, but it is a compulsory reading for those who deal with policy making in matters of science and health, for those who invest in science and technology companies, and no least for those who write about science and technology, whether for professional or lay audience.”

LINKS

HOME

HEIM